Skip Links to ContentCentre for Research on Innovation and Competition

Archive

Layout graphic
Printed from www.cric.ac.uk. Copyright CRIC.
This page is part of the CRIC web archive

Organisations, Innovation and Complexity: New Perspectives on the Knowledge Economy

Link to Nexsus
CRIC logo

9th-10th September 2004
University of Manchester, Manchester,
England, UK.

Conference Aims | Paper Abstracts & Deadlines | Programme | Times and Organisation | Conference Fees | Accommodation | Further Information | Booking Form

A case study of the 3 largest aerospace manufacturing organisations: an exploration of organisational strategy, innovation and evolution

Liz Varga

liz.varga@cranfield.ac.uk

Complex Systems Management Centre,
Cranfield University, UK

Abstract

Many of the most successful firms have placed a strong emphasis on strategy. Strategies help decision-makers in organisations to think though what the organisation needs to achieve and how it can achieve it. Implementing strategies and acting strategically places a focus on the long term and the things that really matter. The allocation of resources in line with strategic plans ensures that short-term interruptions do not deflect from long-term goals. Strategies need to be adaptable to changing circumstances, balancing the possible with the probable.

This paper considers what the Chief Executive Officers of the top three aerospace manufacturers say about their strategies and how these strategies are being implemented. The aerospace manufacturing industry is interesting from a number of respects: its dependency on innovation, its global nature, its relationships with government and other firms and the different characteristics of the civil and defence markets. The triad is also interesting because of the portfolio mixes which include largely defence, largely civil and a balanced portfolio organisation.

Limited to what the Chief Executive Officers have to say in their latest Annual Reports and what these reports state about the organisational structures, this case study attempts to describe how these organisational forms help or hinder the process of business conjectures led by strategies. It considers the internal diversity and richness of the people and their ability to generate novel and innovative ideas and the extent to which they are free to step onto a new path and deny current knowledge. The generative capacities of encounters between individuals and of innovation “at the interfaces” between organisations is also discussed. And the effect of performance in the market and changes in market demand on each organisation’s strategy is reviewed.

Back to paper abstracts

Top

CRIC is now proud to be part of the Manchester Institute of Innovation Research (MIoIR)
Centre for Research on Innovation and Competition (CRIC), The University of Manchester,
Harold Hankins Building, Booth Street West, Manchester M13 9QH, England
Phone +44 (0)161 275 7365 Fax: +44 (0) 161 275 7361
Site maintained by: Ishty Hussain

Page last updated: 9 November, 2007 | Copyright MIoIR. All rights reserved.
Layout graphic

WWW CRIC
Home
Welcome
Staff
Students
Vacancies
Output
Research
Publications
Annual Report
PhD Programme
Interaction
Events
Mailing List
Find
Visitors' Guide
Index
Layout graphicPhoto of inside of CRIC
NEWS....

CRIC has combined with PREST to form the Manchester Institute of Innovation Research (MIoIR).

New book: Trust in Food, A Comparative and Institutional Analysis by Unni Kjaernes, Mark Harvey & Alan Warde.

CRIC Final Report to ESRC:"Main Report" and "CRIC Performance Indicators 1997-2006".

CRIC Papers

'Instituted Or Embedded? Legal, Fiscal and Economic Institutionalisation of Markets' by Mark Harvey

'Beyond Efficiency and Market Shares: Competition within the Finnish Games Industry' by Mirva Peltoniemi

'Accounting for Economic Evolution: Fitness and the Population Method' by Stan Metcalfe

'Innovation and Final Consumption: Social Practices, Instituted Modes of Provision and Intermediation' by Andrew McMeekin & Dale Southerton

'Alfred Marshall’s Mecca: Reconciling the Theories of Value and Development' by Stan Metcalfe