Skip Links to ContentCentre for Research on Innovation and Competition

Archive

Layout graphic
Printed from www.cric.ac.uk. Copyright CRIC.
This page is part of the CRIC web archive

Organisations, Innovation and Complexity: New Perspectives on the Knowledge Economy

Link to Nexsus
CRIC logo

9th-10th September 2004
University of Manchester, Manchester,
England, UK.

Conference Aims | Paper Abstracts & Deadlines | Programme | Times and Organisation | Conference Fees | Accommodation | Further Information | Booking Form

The Allocation of Complexity

Jason Potts

j.potts@economics.uq.edu.au

School of Economics & ACCS,
University of Queensland, Australia

Abstract

Much thought and effort has gone into the design of new conceptual frameworks and theoretical tools for the analysis of evolving, self-transforming economic systems; some of which I have contributed to, as have all of us here. Nevertheless, why not follow Marshall? In this paper, we present a novel yet not unfamiliar way of analyzing the complexity of self-organization in economic systems. We propose a comparative static framework for analysis of the allocation of rules between different classes of carrier. We start by assuming complexity (i.e. that evolutionary forces maintain complexity in open systems) and then analyzing the distribution of state-space equilibria under different relative costs (prices) of embedding rule-complexity in different systems (such as in agents, or in institutions). The outcome is an allocation of complexity. Changes in relative prices, as caused by technological, institutional or financial innovation, say, will effect the position of the equilibria in carrier-space. We may therefore study how changes in the cost of embedding rules conditions the evolution of the complexity of an economic system. The upshot is a set of simple tools for arraying economic forces over the different dimensions of economic evolution in order to study the effects of relative price changes on the dynamics of economic evolution. The use of complexity as a conservational concept (and its derivative, a convexity argument) may prove expedient for further theoretical and conceptual development of economic analysis. The generic graphical model, and a possible bridge between neoclassical and complexity economics, looks as such:

Graphical model showing possible bridge between neoclassical and complexity economics

Back to paper abstracts

Top

CRIC is now proud to be part of the Manchester Institute of Innovation Research (MIoIR)
Centre for Research on Innovation and Competition (CRIC), The University of Manchester,
Harold Hankins Building, Booth Street West, Manchester M13 9QH, England
Phone +44 (0)161 275 7365 Fax: +44 (0) 161 275 7361
Site maintained by: Ishty Hussain

Page last updated: 9 November, 2007 | Copyright MIoIR. All rights reserved.
Layout graphic

WWW CRIC
Home
Welcome
Staff
Students
Vacancies
Output
Research
Publications
Annual Report
PhD Programme
Interaction
Events
Mailing List
Find
Visitors' Guide
Index
Layout graphicPhoto of inside of CRIC
NEWS....

CRIC has combined with PREST to form the Manchester Institute of Innovation Research (MIoIR).

New book: Trust in Food, A Comparative and Institutional Analysis by Unni Kjaernes, Mark Harvey & Alan Warde.

CRIC Final Report to ESRC:"Main Report" and "CRIC Performance Indicators 1997-2006".

CRIC Papers

'Instituted Or Embedded? Legal, Fiscal and Economic Institutionalisation of Markets' by Mark Harvey

'Beyond Efficiency and Market Shares: Competition within the Finnish Games Industry' by Mirva Peltoniemi

'Accounting for Economic Evolution: Fitness and the Population Method' by Stan Metcalfe

'Innovation and Final Consumption: Social Practices, Instituted Modes of Provision and Intermediation' by Andrew McMeekin & Dale Southerton

'Alfred Marshall’s Mecca: Reconciling the Theories of Value and Development' by Stan Metcalfe