Skip Links to ContentCentre for Research on Innovation and Competition
 
Layout graphic
Printed from www.cric.ac.uk. Copyright CRIC.

ABSTRACT

'Pressed for Time' - the differential impacts of a 'time squeeze'

CRIC Discussion Paper No. 60

Dr Dale Southerton & Dr Mark Tomlinson

Time, like money, has become a basic unit of measurement during modernity. E.P. Thompson (1967) demonstrated how organising the production process according to time-oriented action was central for the development of industrial societies, while Veblen famously conceptualised time as a resource for displaying social status through leisure - the 'conspicuous abstention from labour' (Veblen, 1925:8). Yet, contemporary anxieties about time go beyond measurement and display. Put simply, time is often viewed as being 'squeezed', that people can no longer find the time to complete the tasks and activities most important to them and that the pace of life is increasing (Cross, 1993; DEMOS, 1995). There are many explanations as to why this is the case. Some address whether there has been substantive changes in the duration of time spent on particular tasks, such as paid and unpaid work (Gershuny, 2000; Schor, 1992). Others consider the temporal organisation of societies (Zerubavel, 1979), while qualitative accounts examine narratives and experiences of those most vulnerable to time pressures (Hochschild, 1997; Thompson, 1996). The problem remains, however, that little agreement can be found regarding whether experiences of a time squeeze (or being harried) are as pervasive as popular discourse suggests, what socio-structural mechanisms generate a time squeeze, and whether its effects are distributed evenly across society.

This paper reviews analysis of the health and lifestyle survey (HALS), 1985 and 1992, and draws upon in-depth semi-structured interviews conducted with twenty British suburban households, in order to shed light on 'senses' of time squeeze. The HALS is interesting because it asked respondents whether they felt 'pressed for time', a subjective term that holds similarities with the concept of being 'harried'. Literally, the verb 'harried' means "to harass" and "to worry" (Oxford English Dictionary). However, since Linder (1970) appropriated the term to describe the 'harried leisure class', its meaning has come to be associated more directly with both a lack of time and the acceleration of daily life. For example, to be harried is similar to being hurried and harassed in the sense that people 'hurry' to complete tasks within limited time frames or feel harassed by the burden of obligations to others. To this, the term 'harried' adds a degree of anxiety regarding the temporal over-load created by the proliferation of simultaneous demands.

[View Paper] [Back to CRIC Papers]

Top

CRIC is now proud to be part of the Manchester Institute of Innovation Research (MIoIR)
Centre for Research on Innovation and Competition (CRIC), The University of Manchester,
Harold Hankins Building, Booth Street West, Manchester M13 9QH, England
Phone +44 (0)161 275 7365 Fax: +44 (0) 161 275 7361
Site maintained by: Ishty Hussain

Page last updated: 9 November, 2007 | Copyright MIoIR. All rights reserved.
Layout graphic

WWW CRIC
Home
Welcome
Staff
Students
Vacancies
Output
Research
Publications
Annual Report
PhD Programme
Interaction
Events
Mailing List
Find
Visitors' Guide
Index
Layout graphicPhoto of inside of CRIC
NEWS....

CRIC has combined with PREST to form the Manchester Institute of Innovation Research (MIoIR).

New book: Trust in Food, A Comparative and Institutional Analysis by Unni Kjaernes, Mark Harvey & Alan Warde.

CRIC Final Report to ESRC:"Main Report" and "CRIC Performance Indicators 1997-2006".

CRIC Papers

'Instituted Or Embedded? Legal, Fiscal and Economic Institutionalisation of Markets' by Mark Harvey

'Beyond Efficiency and Market Shares: Competition within the Finnish Games Industry' by Mirva Peltoniemi

'Accounting for Economic Evolution: Fitness and the Population Method' by Stan Metcalfe

'Innovation and Final Consumption: Social Practices, Instituted Modes of Provision and Intermediation' by Andrew McMeekin & Dale Southerton

'Alfred Marshall’s Mecca: Reconciling the Theories of Value and Development' by Stan Metcalfe